The Puzzle of Peace
Can the Middle East Heal Without Two
States?
Imagine trying to fix a broken vase by gluing only half the
pieces back together. That’s what the latest peace deal in the Middle East
feels like to many observers.
President Trump recently brokered a dramatic ceasefire
between Israel and Hamas. As part of the deal, 20 Israeli hostages were
released after two years in captivity, and hundreds of Palestinian prisoners
were freed. Trump called it the “historic dawn of a new Middle East,” and
leaders cheered as families were reunited and aid began flowing into Gaza London
Evening Standard | MSN Associated
Press News | MSN.
But here’s the catch: the deal doesn’t mention a two-state
solution. That’s the idea that Israel and Palestine should exist as two
separate, independent countries—something the United Nations and many world
leaders have supported for decades.
So, What’s Missing?
Without
a two-state plan:
- Palestinians
still don’t have a recognized country of their own.
- Israel
remains in control of key areas, and tensions over land, identity, and
sovereignty continue.
- Peace
becomes a temporary pause, not a permanent fix.
It’s like calling a truce in a family feud without ever
talking about what caused the fight.
Why Does This Matter?
Peace without justice is fragile. If Palestinians feel
ignored or erased, resentment can grow. If Israelis feel unsafe, fear can
return. Without a clear roadmap for both peoples to coexist with dignity, the
cycle of violence may just be on pause—not over.
What’s Next?
Some leaders still push for a two-state solution. Others
believe new ideas—like shared governance or regional coalitions—might work
better. But one thing’s clear: peace needs more than handshakes and headlines.
It needs a plan that respects both sides.
Comments
Post a Comment